2024 Strategic Workforce Planning E-book Download Now
Org Design

8 Dangers of Benchmarking Organizational Design

When considering organizational design, it's essential to understand the underlying reasons for a benchmarked company's success.

Blog hero image

Benchmarking is the practice of comparing an organization's processes, services, or operations to those of best-in-class companies or industry standards. This practice often extends to organizational design, where businesses compare their structures, roles, and hierarchies to those of successful peers.

While benchmarking can provide valuable insights, it also comes with a set of pitfalls. Let's explore the dangers of blindly adopting benchmarking in organizational design.

Misalignment with Unique Objectives

Every organization has a distinct mission, vision, and set of goals. Just because a particular organizational design works for one company does not mean it will suit another. Blindly copying another organization's design can lead to misalignment with one's unique objectives and strategic priorities.

Inhibits Innovation

Emulating industry standards can create a culture of complacency. Organizations might end up following rather than leading. Over-reliance on benchmarking can stifle creativity and hinder the development of innovative solutions tailored for a company's unique challenges and opportunities.

Different Contexts

Businesses operate within diverse environments, cultures, and market conditions. An organizational design that works in one context might fail miserably in another.

Factors like company size, geographic presence, or workforce diversity can significantly influence the effectiveness of an organizational structure.

Temporal Disconnect

What worked for a benchmarked company in the past might not be effective in the current or future landscape. Rapid technological changes, shifting consumer preferences, and evolving business models can render past successful designs obsolete.

Overemphasis of Structure

While structure is a vital component of organizational design, it's not the only one. Overemphasizing structure without considering processes, culture, leadership, and capabilities can result in a mismatched organization.

Risk of Copying Flaws

It's essential to remember that no organization is perfect. Benchmarking might lead to the replication of not just the strengths but also the flaws of the target organization. This is especially true if the benchmarking process is superficial and doesn't delve deep into understanding the nuances.

Resource Drain

Benchmarking can be resource-intensive. Focusing too much on how other organizations are structured might divert resources from other critical areas, such as product innovation or talent development.

One-Size-Fits-All Fallacy

Copying a design based on benchmarks can give rise to the dangerous belief that there is a 'one-size-fits-all' solution. This can further discourage critical thinking and the development of tailored solutions.


Benchmarking is a tool, not a destination. It can provide valuable insights and shed light on areas for improvement. However, it's crucial to approach it with a discerning mind.

When considering organizational design, it's essential to understand the underlying reasons for a benchmarked company's success and to customize any insights to fit the unique context, objectives, and culture of your own organization. Always remember: the goal is not to replicate but to learn and adapt.

Dave Kim

Dave Kim

CTO, Agentnoon


Similar posts